Comparison
Fixed price vs hourly billing: which suits your software project?
The short answer: choose a fixed price when you can describe what the system has to do, and hourly billing when the task is pure exploration or nobody knows where it will end. For most SME projects a fixed price is the safer choice, because the risk of overruns sits with the supplier rather than with you.
8 min read · Updated 29 September 2026
The choice between a fixed price and hourly billing is really about one thing: who carries the risk if the project takes longer than expected? With hourly billing it is you. With a fixed price it is the supplier. Both models have their place, but they suit very different tasks, and choosing the wrong one is expensive.
What is the difference between fixed price and hourly billing?
Fixed price
- You know the price before work starts
- The supplier carries the risk of overruns
- Needs a written scope with features and integrations
- Changes are priced before they are built
- The supplier profits from being efficient
Hourly billing
- The price is known only when the work is done
- You carry the risk of overruns
- Can start without a finished scope
- Changes are simply added to the timesheet
- The supplier earns more the longer it takes
The last point is not an accusation. Most suppliers billing by the hour work honestly. But the incentive is skewed, and you feel it when the estimate slips and nobody is really responsible. With a fixed price the incentive is reversed: the supplier has a direct interest in building the right thing quickly and without detours.
When does a fixed price fit, and when does hourly billing?
Rules of thumb for choosing a model.
| Situation | Best model | Why |
|---|---|---|
| New website, web app or app with a known purpose | Fixed price | The features can be listed up front |
| MVP to test a business idea | Fixed price | The budget is limited and the scope must be sharp |
| Integration with known systems such as e-conomic or MobilePay | Fixed price | The APIs are documented and the task is defined |
| Debugging an old, undocumented system | Hourly | Nobody knows what is hiding in the code |
| Research and experiments with new technology | Hourly with a cap | The goal is learning, not a specific deliverable |
| Ongoing development after launch | Fixed price per feature | Each change is small and can be priced on its own |
If you are building something new to test an idea, also read about MVP development. And to understand why the hourly rate on its own is a poor basis for comparison, see developer hourly rates.
How is a fixed-price scope written?
A good scope is not a thick document. It is a precise list that both you and the supplier can point to when doubts arise. A managing director should be able to read it in ten minutes, and it should still be concrete enough for a developer to know what to build.
- Purpose: what problem does the system solve, and how will you know it works?
- Users and roles: who logs in, and what may each role see and do?
- Features: a numbered list, one line per feature, such as "staff can create an order".
- Integrations: which systems must it talk to, and which way does data flow?
- Out of scope: what is deliberately left for later, written down.
- Acceptance: how you sign off that each feature has been delivered.
- Running: hosting, updates, support and backups after launch, and the monthly cost.
Point five is the one most people skip, and it is the one that most often causes conflict. When what is not included is written down, there is no doubt about what is. We have a ready-made requirements specification template you can start from. For the job portal Jobero we started from the first sketch and built the brand, the design and the full system, and there too a sharp boundary around the first version was what got the project off the ground.
How are changes handled in a fixed-price project?
New idea
You have an idea during the project or after launch and describe it briefly.
Within scope?
If it adjusts an existing feature, it is part of the work.
Fixed price for the new
If it is a new feature, it gets a fixed price per feature, stated up front.
You decide
You approve in writing and the feature is built. If you say no, nothing happens.
Our packages are built on exactly that model: 12, 24 or 36 features and 1, 2 or 3 integrations at a fixed price from DKK 18,000 plus a fixed monthly plan. See them under pricing. For a concrete proposal, describe your project here and you will get a written fixed-price proposal within 24 hours.
Questions about fixed price and hourly billing
Is a fixed price more expensive than hourly billing?
What happens if we change our minds along the way?
When is hourly billing the right choice?
Do we need a requirements specification to get a fixed price?
How fast can we get a fixed-price proposal?
Is there a middle ground between fixed price and hourly billing?
Want us to build it for you?
You get a fixed-price proposal within 24 hours.
